Strategic infrastructure | Research & innovation

Ian Dunsmore

Turning difficult questions into evidence for action

I connect operational reality, specialist research, partners and data so that innovation changes decisions and delivers practical outcomes. My experience spans more than 25 years of water operations, strategic planning, resilience and commercial innovation in Scotland and New Zealand.

UK first Project managed sewage heat recovery at Borders College
30,000 pipes Synthetic proof of concept for failure prediction research
Evidence first Operational concerns converted into questions that can be tested
International Utility experience in Scotland and New Zealand

Selected work

How evidence changed the next decision

First-of-kind delivery

Sewage heat recovery at Borders College

Project managed the UK's first sewage heat recovery installation, coordinating Borders College, the technology provider, Scottish Water Operations and regulatory stakeholders.

Evidence: temperature monitoring linked to telemetry showed that modest rainfall changed inlet temperature more than the installed system did.

Outcome: the scheme was delivered and received the Green Gown Award for Best Newcomer in 2017 and Scottish Green Energy Award for Best Innovation in 2018.

Predictive analytics

Rethinking likelihood of failure

Questioned the use of Remaining Service Life as a proxy for pipe failure, researched Random Forest applications in Norway and Canada, and built an initial proof of concept using a synthetic dataset of approximately 30,000 pipes.

Evidence boundary: synthetic data is cleaner than a real network and failures are sparse. Those limits are part of the research, not footnotes to it.

Current status: Scottish Water's Analytics team is progressing implementation and testing with external expertise. The aim is to identify the most defensible method and the data it needs.

Strategic influence

A safer alternative at Milngavie

Challenged the assumption that two ageing needle valves required a like-for-like replacement. When the first alternative was rejected, I returned with baseline acoustic monitoring, incremental pressure changes, explicit stop criteria and a reversible plan.

Judgement: the challenge was not something to overcome. It identified the evidence and controls needed for a responsible decision.

Potential, not realised benefit: if testing supports the approach, it could avoid a substantial capital replacement and ongoing attendance costs.

Leadership through change

Keeping a new team useful under constraint

Led a newly formed strategic planning team through organisational change, shifting priorities, resource pressure and a substantial reduction in available investment.

Response: met people individually, involved the team in resetting priorities and redirected constrained field-investigation capacity into better failure methods and asset approaches.

Learning: psychological safety and accountability work together. People need room to question, and clarity about what useful progress looks like.

Partnerships and funding

Taking a demonstrator into the market

Built on the Borders College demonstrator by identifying sites and customers, engaging industry bodies, hosting visits and writing bids to the Scottish Government's Low Carbon Infrastructure Transition Programme.

Collaboration: contributed to opportunities including Stirling Council's district heating network around Stirling sewage treatment works.

Learning: a useful demonstrator is not the end point. It needs partners, ownership and a credible route into operation.

Strategic infrastructure

Planning nationally significant assets

Lead a geographically distributed team of seven planners working across trunk mains, aqueducts, tunnels, subsea pipelines and complex valve infrastructure.

Context: priorities and funding change. The work is to maintain a defensible line between asset evidence, service risk and investment choices.

Focus: clearer likelihood and consequence methods, asset-specific approaches and better use of external learning.

Working principles

Research and innovation should improve a real decision

Start with the operational question

  • What decision needs to improve?
  • What evidence would change it?
  • Who will own the outcome?

Make uncertainty visible

  • Separate a prototype from a proven method
  • Name data limits and competing explanations
  • Use challenge to improve the test

Design the next safe step

  • Stage change around evidence
  • Set stop criteria before starting
  • Keep early tests reversible

Experience

Career path

  1. 2021 - Present

    Technical Team Manager - Strategic Water Infrastructure

    Scottish Water

  2. 2018 - 2021

    Strategic Planner - Water Resilience

    Scottish Water

  3. 2015 - 2018

    Project Manager - Business Development

    Scottish Water Horizons

  4. 2007 - 2015

    Planning, Risk, Asset Management, and Leakage Roles

    Scottish Water

  5. 2005 - 2007

    Water Engineer

    Timaru District Council, New Zealand

  6. 1998 - 2005

    Early Career in Network Analysis and Consultancy

    Scottish Water and RPS Water Services

About

Where I add most value

I work as a translator between operational reality, specialist research and investment decisions. My strongest contribution is framing the right question, bringing together the people who can answer it and creating conditions where the evidence can change what happens next.

My background is practitioner-led rather than conventional academic research. I treat that boundary as a reason to collaborate with the best available experts, while keeping the work grounded in assets, services and the people who operate them.

Contact

Open to the right conversation

For strategic infrastructure, water-sector research and innovation, resilience or evidence-led change. Contact details are included on the CV page.